Wednesday, February 15, 2017

Short Essay : Will paid-knowledge be the next blue ocean for Internet companies?

SONG Shuyi 1155081864

Are you willing to pay for knowledge?

“Free”, one of the most important things that the Internet has brought to the world, has dramatically changed economic environment and people's way of thinking. For a long time, “sharing for free” has been the internet spirit that people insist on. It has in a way broken the boundary between the haves and have-nots, has brought far-reaching influence on the business modal of many companies, until now. For example, companies can make profits by “free model”, like many news digital platforms who provide free news content to users and earn revenue by advertising.

Sharing economy is not a new concept, we have Uber for sharing transportation, Airbnb for sharing accommodation, but we haven’t formed a mature business model for sharing knowledge. Knowledge used to be exclusive right for upper class, but new technologies and new digitized sources greatly decrease the cost of knowledge, making more and more knowledge, information and wisdom accessible and affordable for more and more people.

“Information wants to be free” was once a strong slogan. But it seems the situation is changing now. What if knowledge and information online has to be paid? Will the strategy save some internet companies who burn lots of money?

Why the concept “information wants to be free” is changed?

The rapid development of paid-knowledge (知识付费) industry rely mainly on the change of consumption concept and the development of mobile payment technology.

From an economic perspective, people’s consumption structure has undergone changes, people are more willing to pay for products with higher quality and better service. When the Internet lower the threshold for diffusing knowledge and information, the quality of information varies. People regard buying knowledge of high quality worthwhile, for it’s a way of investing in themselves. At the same time, the way of acquiring knowledge has changed as well, from books, PC to mobile devices, from a passive position to initiative seeking. These kinds of concepts give birth to business logic for paid-knowledge.

Also, there are complex issues of copyright and intellectual property rights when content are provided free online. It’s a way to protect rights and interests of creators that should be encouraged.

Examples of “pained-knowledge” practice

Ximalaya FM (喜马拉雅FM) is a Chinese online audio service platform that enables users to share audio and personal radio stations. Since last year, it has cooperated with several publishing companies to make paid audio books with high quality, which will become the main part of its paid content on the platform. Audio books that produced by PUGC model has been one of the most popular content on Ximalaya FM, which all used to be free for audience. Ximalaya thinks valuable and professional content need to be paid, so it has made the first move to turn a part of knowledge-oriented audio books to “paid-content” model, while keep the ones with entertainment-oriented content remain free. It works out pretty well by now, but how to create a new and sustainable modal to perfect audio book industrial chian still face big challenges.

In 2016, Zaihang.com has launched a product called “Fenda” (分答), which translates to “one-minute answers” in Chinese, are encouraged to make some money by either asking or answering questions. Those with some knowledge to share can set a price from one yuan to a few thousand yuan for answering a question. The answers are delivered via voice message, capped at 60 seconds. Users can pay the preset price and ask any kind of question to whomever they want on the site. For one yuan, other users can simply eavesdrop and listen to the reply. The more users eavesdrop, the more money question-and-answer participants are supposed to make. According to data from Zaihang.com, Fenda recorded more than one million paid users within the first three days of its launch.

These two typical practices have made more and more people look more attention into the still new market – “paid knowledge”.

Will “paid-knowledge” be the next blue ocean for internet companies?

Besides of some paid-knowledge attempts, it’s still a blue ocean for the market. If internet companies could make good use of blue ocean strategy to develop the market, not only they can capture a certain number of loyalty customers, but also make profits by such new business modal.

Despite different industrial chain behind different knowledge forms, this market has some same patterns considering the ERRC grid for blue ocean strategy. For “Eliminate” grid, companies should eliminate inferior content on their online platform as much as possible, if users consider your platform worthless, they will not pay for it; for “Reduce” grid, some marketing spending on other free content could be reduced. Advertising revenue might be cut down for better user experience. Giving up some free offering may lose part of the users; for “Raise” grid, most importantly, the quality of knowledge and content need to be improved, only knowledge with high quality have the value to be paid for. More focus should be put on the marketing strategy for paid-knowledge; for “Create” gird, unique content, and attractive acceptable forms of sharing paid knowledge should be created with good usability to increase user interaction.


But there are always free content existing, “free” concept still influence people’s mind about the Internet. The “paid-knowledge” market has a long way to go.

Reference:
1.     联手多家出版社,有声书付费会是喜马拉雅的下一片蓝海吗?
2.     A yuan for your thoughts? Fenda provides Service for one-minute answers

13 comments:

  1. Hi Shuyi, happy to see your insights on paid-knowledge and sharing economy. In the short essay, you mentioned “Fenda” as an example. It is obvious that this Q&A platform is a pretty platform to promote users’ deep engagement.
    while I’m still a little bit confused about this app, because for a fee ranging from a few hundred to a few thousand RMB, Fenda allows netizens to ask celebrities questions. Maybe many people heard about the story of a celebrity Wang Sicong. He made over US$45,000 on Fenda for answering questions involving his personal gossip, which is unimaginable in the old days.
    In my point of view, it is difficult to answer a professional question within 60 second, which makes Fenda potentially become a public sphere flooding with star anecdotes, private gossip and chicken soup jokes of collection. Based on this model, I’m curious that if one day, there’s no longer such celebrity resources like Wang Sicong can be consumed on the market, how Fenda continue to make profits? It is of great significance to find a sustainable and reliable model for such sharing economy industry.
    Thank you for your essay. ^^

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your reply :)! Actually I have the same worries as yours. When Fenda was first launched, it gained heated responses and became a phenomenal product in a very short period, because of its interesting model and the participance of celebrities. But after a few months, its popularity has gone down quickly. 60 seconds can only cover finite content, although we cannot deny that some fragmented knowledge has its value, most true valuable knowledge needs more time to elaborate and absorb. Fenda's model may be useful for spreading fragmented knowledge but a complete knowledge system. Also there is a blurry line between paying for valuable knowledge and paying for those KOL/celebrities.
      But the idea of paying for knowledge need to be encouraged. We hope that Fenda can find a way to optimize its product and find sustainable business model. Thanks!

      Delete
  2. Hi Shuyi,

    I'm pretty interested in your topic and it's visionary of you to choose paid-knowledge as your object of discussion! It's really worth exploring! Based on your essay, I'd like to share some of my ideas about paid-knowledge.

    1. Why do these paid-knowledge online products and services suddenly emerge?

    a. consumer perspective:

    Of course, consumers are desired for high-quality knowledge to invest in themselves in both the long-term and short-term, or to solve their problems. However, what triggers consumers to pay for knowledge (or information) online is the high searching cost of satisfying customized needs. Overwhelmed by unlimited knowledge and information of different quality, they are more willing to pay comparatively low cost to save their time cost of searching.

    Another reason from the consumer perspective is to lower monetary cost. Though they have to pay for some audios, videos or books to get high-quality knowledge or useful information, the prices are comparatively low and they don't have to travel to listen to the live speeches.

    b. product/company perspective:

    Q&A online communities like Zhihu.com and Guokr.com have struggled for a long time dealing with making money. These knowledge-based online communities are cautious about the model of earning revenues through advertising. How to monetize the contents and user bases on these platforms? Paid-knowledge products and services could be a way out. In conclusion, the essence of paid knowledge is transforming knowledge into products and services in order to realize business values.

    Then the question is whether the introduction of economic elements will boost the efficiency of knowledge sharing and consumption?

    Since we're still at the early stage of paid-knowledge product/service development, it might be well if we have a deeper look at major formats of paid-knowledge online, as well as some typical available paid-knowledge products and services.

    2. Major types of paid-knowledge online:

    Most of the paid-knowledge could be classified into the following two types:
    a. subjective opinions
    b. professional judgements or know-hows (skills and techniques)

    Most of the paid-knowledge available are subjective opinions and professional advices which may not be easily applied to real life contexts. We can also see some short-term hard core knowledge and long-term cultural cultivation knowledge.

    3. Typical available paid-knowledge products and services:

    a. E-book
    b. Audio book (like which you mentioned on Ximalaya FM)
    c. Publishing
    d. Education: e.g. MOOC and interactive online education or consultancy services provided through means of live streaming or WeChat grouping teaching.
    e. One-to-One Knowledge-based Services9(e.g. Fenda分答 as you mentioned, and Zaihang在行)
    f. Subscription of Media contents

    3. Ideas of the future development of paid-knowledge products and services:

    a.
    Expanding products and services from 2C to 2B. Companies are more result-oriented, so 2B products should establish meaningful measurements for results.

    b.
    More interactive elements will be taken into consideration. Consumers want to pay for knowledge, but they are more willing to solve personal problems in a deeper and interactive way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your excellent complementary ideas! It's very informative, having given me more inspirations! We can see that there are already multiple types of paid-knowledge forms and products in the market, but its economy scale is not big, as well as with low benefits. Maybe it's important for these platforms to improve product experience and seek a feasible model, as well as explore more deep user demand. I agree with your ideas about the future development of this industry. But I guess 2B model is like what most consulting companies are doing ,maybe the most difficult thing is how to develop 2C market.

      Delete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. 舒怡啊,(我們之間就不用客套了哈哈)
    我就用中文評論了,請見諒。
    對於“知識付費”這個問題,我想說幾點自己的看法。
    首先,我認為只有付費的產品才可能有持續的高質量,這一點不僅針對於購買者,同時針對創業者。換句話說,這一點是同時說給產品和消費者聽的。做免費的東西是很容易收穫不真實的市場反饋的。因為一旦有人抱怨你的產品不好,作為運營產品的人很容易用免費的為藉口去敷衍,而最終忽視自己產品本身的問題。同時那些很有水平並且很願意為你提供高質量意見反饋的用戶也會因為這項產品或者服務是免費的從而大小投訴的念頭,這對於產品更新和完善,包括對用戶本身的體驗,都是很不好的現象。從這個角度看,付費是雙向有利的,消費者可以正當投訴,創業者可以收穫高質量的反饋從而反思產品問題。
    如果單從知識的生產方看待“知識付費”這個為題就變得很複雜了,涉及到知識的“定價”,之後又涉及到“品牌”。我能力有限所以無法分析這其中的原因所以沒辦法很清楚的分析為什麼付費知識會成為大勢所趨。
    不過我們可以確定的是,在未來,內容的生產一定會從像我現在這樣“寫評論”一樣隨意的表達,變成“知識產品”,而這種“知識產品也會根據用戶的需求形成更完整的“交互設計”,從而產生一系列的“定制化解決方案”,就像design thinking 那個環一樣,不斷的更新迭代,最後以圖書影像出版為主的知識市場可能就要被顛覆了。其實這些早就在發生了,只不過還是不夠明顯。(因為其實2000萬人在讀有聲書從大環境上看並不是一個很龐大的群體)。
    這是我把知識當做產品來看的一些讚同點,可是但從知識內容本身來說我其實不太看好這個發展趨勢。因為這個社會永遠都是由睿智的A和愚蠢的B群體來組成的,作為愚蠢的B群體的我,我很期待看到睿智的A寫的東西(產生的知識)會帶給我無限的啟迪,也很希望睿智的A可以洞察世間冷暖不顧世間險惡。所以在這個付費的知識體系下,如果A為了迎合我這種愚蠢的B從而產生更大的利益價值導致他不能獨立思考甚至不能表達“異見”,那我覺得這種“媚俗”的狀態又會影響內容本身的質量了……所以又會回去第一點,那麼產品質量本身的問題又是值得思考的問題了。
    綜上所述,我覺得對於喜馬拉雅來說,能否成為藍海在於他能否平衡內容的高質量(來自於作者的獨立思考和超群的思想觀點)和產品的高質量(來自於付費用戶帶來的經濟及信息回報)之間的關係了。

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 第8行,“打消”不是”大小“。。sorry。。

      Delete
    2. 哈哈哈謝謝你這麼認真的回復。對於前半段,我覺得其實從另一個角度上來說沒有完全免費的產品,如果某個產品對於用戶來說是免費的,那麼它一定通過其他方式獲取收益,比如廣告,那麼擁有一個大的用戶流量是基礎,用戶體驗也要兼顧,創業者還是要想辦法去解決產品問題以及改進產品,所以即使是看上去免費的產品,歸根結底還是有經濟利益驅動的。
      另外我很同意知識產品很複雜,其中涉及到很多要解決的問題,比如你提到的給知識定價,多少是合適的很難把控;還有如果平台利用知識賺錢,那知識的版權如何歸屬,是歸提供答案的人,還是平台?不同知識的形式背後還有一整個產業鏈,怎麼平衡這一個產業鏈的問題。我能力也有限,這些問題我也回答不了。
      最後,我想說,你不是愚蠢的B群,我相信這其中還有一個C群,智商是介於睿智的A群和愚蠢的B群之間的,你可能屬於C群,哈哈哈哈。
      謝謝我親愛的Cathy!

      Delete
  5. Susie, thanks a lot for your sharing! Just at the time when you post this essay, Tencent confirms it will launch the paid function in the WeChat subscription. I think it is worthy exploring can the paid-knowledge model go further or not in the dominance of Free Internet.

    It is reported by iResearch that over 50% netizens once or willing pay for the content, while this figure is 30% two years ago. As customers are pursuing high quality product and services, the way of accessing information is changing now. Users are transferring from the aimlessly accepting information into the initiative knowledge searching. The information selection behavior is more mature at this stage.

    In the past year, many online knowledge platform and community launched their paid-knowledge products after many years of free operation, such as the Ximalaya, Fenda you have mentioned. And from the example of Zhihu Live, the consumption per capita was 52.08%, and the repeat purchase rate reached 37% according to the official report of Zhihu. The one-hour presentation provides the speaker 10 thousand on average while the highest was 150 thousand. For WeChat subscription operators, though some of them have attempt to charge readers for more professional articles (eg. 吴晓波频道),the profits only came from the advertising, soft article or reader rewards for majority. I think it is a cusp for the knowledge industry and I agree with you it is a blue ocean for Internet companies.

    Personally, paying for music or digital media is impossible to me previously, however, I recharge a small amount of money in Dedao (得到) to listen books, and I'm considering to subscribe Bloomberg Weekly for a month.

    Sooner or later, though, paying for knowledge will be a norm.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, Jasmine! You have provided more meaningful figures and examples, really thank you for that! I also have positive perspective about this industry, and I'm glad to see nowadays some music apps and video platforms attach importance to those intellectual properties, although from the very beginning, I'm also a little bit unaccustomed to spend money on digital platforms.
      P.S. I have heard about Dedao but haven't used it. You make me wanna have a try :)

      Delete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi 舒怡,

    I totally agree that online one-to-one paid-knowledge service will be a blue ocean in near future. Your essay is very inspiring and I just want to add an example of paid-knowledge practice-- one-to-many online education. To be more specific, I mean something like MOOC and 新东方网课. From my perspective, some online courses teaching TOEFL, SAT, IELTS are pretty mature (well-established). A lot of education agencies are competing in this market and some are making good money from this business.

    So I wonder how do you think of this kind of paid-knowledge services? Are they still blue ocean or become red ocean already?

    ZHANG, Wen

    ReplyDelete
  8. Susie谢谢你的分享。关于知识付费,我觉得会是互联网时代的大势所趋。
    在互联网时代,知识一般是通过内容表现出来的。你的文章让我想起了之前看到的关于用户心态的问题,用户们从完全不愿意为内容付费到开始愿意为内容付费的背后,其实暗含着一个逻辑。
    第一阶段,这一类东西极度稀缺的时候,用户是愿意付费的。
    第二阶段,随着供应的人越来越多,它慢慢从稀缺变得充盈,用户对它的付费意愿会开始变得越来越弱。
    第三阶段,再往后,供应者更大程度地增加,内容从充盈变得泛滥。这时候,人们可能又会重新开始产生付费意愿。但这个时候,用户买的,可能已经不是“我能看哪些东西”,而是“哪些东西我一定不看”。

    显然,我们已经渐渐到了第三阶段,在这个信息爆炸又泛滥的时代,用户的注意力和时间严重稀缺,筛选优质内容的成本大大提高,原创者生产优质内容也并非易事。有效的知识付费可能会是一条双赢的路线,直面用户的阅读痛点,通过金钱过滤内容,降低了用户的学习成本,提高了知识的转化率,也能尽大可能地保护原创者的利益。
    但是,“有效”是一个很难评判的量尺。在巨量的信息汪洋中,什么算是真正有价值的知识?如果是“你知道我不知道的”内容,就可以算是我的知识,那么这种评断就很难均衡不同知识水平的人。大量传播和内容变现,对于内容生产者而言,也是一个两难问题。目前大部分人仍然秉持互联网的核心是免费的思维,原创者一旦选择付费订阅,就自动为用户设置了门槛,不可避免地降低传播量。而且“先付费后阅读”的消费模式,增加了不确定性,如果用户读后与心理预期有落差,久而久之就会逃离,内容生产者的吸引力大大下降。
    面对互联网根深蒂固的免费基因,如何让用户心甘情愿地买单,会是一个很大的问题。而且,这个时代的“内容”之争,本质上还是优质的内容生产者之争。“大V”们有着更好的平台和资源,而对于那些内容生产不错但影响力不够的优质潜力股而言,竞争变得更加激烈。那些生活在尾部的内容生产者的状况会不会更加艰难?同时伴随而来的强大的抄袭和盗版又该如何防范?假如内容付费时代真的就此开启,那么以后免费的内容,到底是会越来越少,还是会越来越多?我想这些问题,还需要进一步地挖掘与检验。

    ReplyDelete