Wednesday, February 15, 2017

Group Discussion-A Case Study of iWatch

Group Member:

CHAI, Siyu
LI, Wei
LI, Yinting
LI, Shuangyi
ZHANG, Zhixin


A case study of iWatch-COMM5980 from Yinting Li



SWOT Analysis
Internal
  1. Strength:
    1. Branding & Existing loyal customers.
    2. Easy to use.
    3. It uses iOS system connecting with iPhone directly. Such supportive system facilitates UX of Apple users.
    4. Aesthetic product appearance and hardware/ software design.
    5. Stable supply chain.
  2. Weaknesses:
    1. High Price
    2. Battery capacity limit

External
  1. Opportunities:
    1. High brand awareness / brand loyalty
    2. The increasing popularization of smart wearable devices
    3. Bandwagon/ conformity
    4. Rising consumption level
    5. Profitable watch market
     2.    Threats
    1. Strong Competitors (Xiaomi, Fitbit, Samsung, Moto-360)
    2. Customers are fickle
    3. Differentiation
    4. Public concern over privacy issues of smart watch
    5. Lack of necessity

Business Model Canvas


Porter’s Five Forces
  1. Threat of New Entry--relatively low
    1. Time and cost of entry: long develop period & high cost
    2. Specialist knowledge: need both developer & designer
    3. Economic of scale: hardware
    4. Technology protection: copyright
    5. Barriers to entry: relatively high

  1. Threat of Substitution--high
  1. Substitute performance:
    1. Substitution within the industry. e.g. Xiaomi, Fitbit, Samsung Gear,  Moto-360
    2. Substitution from other industries which provides similar function as iWatch. e.g. further developed smart phone; other wearable smart device like ring, necklace.
  2. Cost performance: Customers will consider more about cost performance of the product instead of performance itself
  3. Cost of change: relatively high

  1. Supplier Power--low
    1. Numbers of suppliers: around 15
    2. Size of suppliers: large
    3. Uniqueness of service: low labor fee; low technique content e.g. Foxconn
    4. Ability to substitute: Those suppliers offer non-substitutable service so that it’s kind of hard to switch to other suppliers
    5. Products are differentiated or there are built-up switching costs
  2. Buyer Power--low
    1. Number of customers: large
    2. Differences between competitors: large
    3. Price sensitivity: low; demand will still increase because of brand loyalty
    4. Ability to substitute

  1. Competitive Rivalry-- fierce
  1. Number of competitors: more than 10 competitors
  2. Quality differences: relatively large
  3. Other differences: feature/performance; design; price; homogeneous functionality
  4. Switching costs: relatively high
  5. Customer loyalty: high

Blue Ocean Strategy

ERRC Grid

Eliminate
  1. Diversity/ richness of the appearance design

Raise
  1. Battery
  2. Resolution (retina)
  3. Gravity sensor
  4. Software
Reduce

N/A

Create
  1. Voice recognition
  2. Payment system (Apple pay)


Conclusion: iwatch is not a Blue Ocean Strategy but it wins in the Red Ocean. iwatch keeps creating new features to beat other competitors in the same industry market.  

No comments:

Post a Comment